During development I encountered a caveat: Opus 4.5 can’t test or view a terminal output, especially one with unusual functional requirements. But despite being blind, it knew enough about the ratatui terminal framework to implement whatever UI changes I asked. There were a large number of UI bugs that likely were caused by Opus’s inability to create test cases, namely failures to account for scroll offsets resulting in incorrect click locations. As someone who spent 5 years as a black box Software QA Engineer who was unable to review the underlying code, this situation was my specialty. I put my QA skills to work by messing around with miditui, told Opus any errors with occasionally a screenshot, and it was able to fix them easily. I do not believe that these bugs are inherently due to LLM agents being better or worse than humans as humans are most definitely capable of making the same mistakes. Even though I myself am adept at finding the bugs and offering solutions, I don’t believe that I would inherently avoid causing similar bugs were I to code such an interactive app without AI assistance: QA brain is different from software engineering brain.
// ... other quest routes，更多细节参见搜狗输入法下载
。关于这个话题，同城约会提供了深入分析
Get editor selected deals texted right to your phone!
name text NOT NULL,。业内人士推荐Line官方版本下载作为进阶阅读
一个 2.7 亿的模型可能会产生虚假的参数值。如果没有约束，请求“把它变成红色”可能会生成 {“color”: “crimson”} 或 {“color”: “rouge”}。枚举类型强制模型仅从有效值中选择，从而确保函数调用的可靠性。